ibclaw.in

Обзор веб-сайта ibclaw.in

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

 Сгенерирован 02 Мая 2026 17:29

Устаревшие данные? ОБНОВИТЬ !

Набрано баллов: 56/100

СЕО Контент

Заголовок страницы

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

Длина : 87

В идеале, Ваш заголовок страницы должен содержать от 10 до 70 символов (вместе с пробелами). Используйте этот бесплатный инструмент для подсчета длины символов в тексте.

Описание страницы

India’s Leading Insolvency Platform. IBC Laws publishes case laws, legal contents, commentary, articles with wide range of search functions using advance technology. A complete guide on Indian Insolvency Laws. All about Indian Insolvency Laws.

Длина : 243

В идеале, Ваше описание страницы должено содержать от 70 до 160 символов (вместе с пробелами). Используйте этот бесплатный инструмент для подсчета длины символов в тексте.

Ключевые слова

Очень плохо. Мы не нашли ключевых слов на Вашем веб-сайте. Используйте бесплатный генератор мета-тэгов, чтобы сгенерировать ключевые слова.

Og Meta Properties

Вы не используете преимущества Og Properties. Эти мета-тэги помогают социальным роботам лучше структурировать Ваш сайт. Используйте бесплатный генератор og properties, чтобы создать их.

Заголовки

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
0 20 4 39 3 16
  • [H2] All about Indian Insolvency Laws | All-in-One
  • [H2] Welcome to India’s #1 Insolvency Platform
  • [H2] Dedicated Unified Platform | All-in-One
  • [H2] Complete Case Summary (DeepSummary) with HeadNote
  • [H2] Expert Note/ Case Brief
  • [H2] Case Status/ Cross Linking
  • [H2] AI-Trained Query Search
  • [H2] EXTRA Filters
  • [H2] Powerful Search with Boolean Operators
  • [H2] Court Friendly Print/ PDF
  • [H2] Case Note & MyFolder
  • [H2] Legal Contents
  • [H2] One Dashboard & Easy Login
  • [H2] Periodically Digests
  • [H2] Regular WhatsApp/ Email Updates
  • [H2] Mobile, Tablet & Desktop Friendly
  • [H2] Trusted by Courts/ Tribunals
  • [H2] Testimonials
  • [H2] Our Subscribers
  • [H2] India’s Leading Insolvency Platform
  • [H3] Find right case law, analyse it with DeepSummary, and stay updated with timely, complete, accurate, and reliable reporting
  • [H3] Explore the Platform Features
  • [H3] Contact Details​
  • [H3] Start Now
  • [H4] A structured legal research database offering comprehensive case summaries (DeepSummary) along with verbatim full texts of judgments, HeadNotes, editorially curated case briefs, AI-trained query search, in-depth research through EXTRA filters, powerful advanced search with Boolean operators, personal case notes, MyFolder, court-ready PDFs, and integrated statutory content—designed for precise, efficient, and in-depth legal research, all on one unified platform.
  • [H4] An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench
  • [H4] Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
  • [H4] While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench
  • [H4] Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT
  • [H4] RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT
  • [H4] Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai
  • [H4] Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court
  • [H4] Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya
  • [H4] Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah
  • [H4] When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla
  • [H4] Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims
  • [H4] Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers
  • [H4] Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026
  • [H4] Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI
  • [H5] ✅ Trusted by Courts & Tribunals
  • [H5] Phone Numbers​​
  • [H5] Email
  • [H6] Smt. Bidisha Banerjee
  • [H6] Justice Rohit Kapoor
  • [H6] Ramji Srinivasan
  • [H6] Justice Rajasekhar VK
  • [H6] Dr. Neeti Shikha
  • [H6] Adv. Kajal Bhatia
  • [H6] Dr. Charu Mathur
  • [H6] Dr. M. S. Sahoo
  • [H6] Adv. CS Dr. Mamta Binani
  • [H6] Arvind Devanathan
  • [H6] Poonam Bisht
  • [H6] Raj Panchmatia
  • [H6] Adv. Nipun Singhvi
  • [H6] Anjali Sharma, Adv & Insolvency Professional
  • [H6] Get in Touch
  • [H6] Get Case Laws on WhatsApp

Картинки

Мы нашли 263 картинок на этом веб-сайте.

254 alt атрибута(-ов) не найдено. Добавив альтернативный текст, поисковые роботы будут лучше понимать содержание картинки.

Соотношение Контент/HTML

Соотношение : 0%

Соотношение текста в коде HTML у этой страницы меньше чем 15 процентов, это означает, что Вашем веб-сайту требуется больше контента.

Flash

Замечательно, мы не нашли Flash контента на странице.

Iframe

Замечательно, мы не зафиксировали Iframe'ов на Вашей странице.

ЧПУ ссылки

Отлично, все Ваши ссылки являются ЧПУ!

Нижнее подчеркивание в ссылках

Прекрасно! Мы не нашли "нижнее подчеркивание" в Ваших ссылках.

Внутренние ссылки

Мы нашли 61 ссылок(-и), включая 0 ссылок ссылок(-и) на файл(-ы).

Анкор Тип Вес ссылки
Skip to content Внутренняя Передает вес
WA Updates Внутренняя Передает вес
MyFolders|Notes Внутренняя Передает вес
Acts Внутренняя Передает вес
Articles Внутренняя Передает вес
OnePage Внутренняя Передает вес
Case Laws Внутренняя Передает вес
AI Search Внутренняя Передает вес
Insolvency Journal (Print) Внутренняя Передает вес
Renew Внутренняя Передает вес
Login Внутренняя Передает вес
Subscription Внутренняя Передает вес
An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench Внутренняя Передает вес
The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench Внутренняя Передает вес
Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Внутренняя Передает вес
Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Внутренняя Передает вес
While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench Внутренняя Передает вес
Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT Внутренняя Передает вес
RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT Внутренняя Передает вес
Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai Внутренняя Передает вес
Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai Внутренняя Передает вес
Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai Внутренняя Передает вес
Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Внутренняя Передает вес
When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court Внутренняя Передает вес
Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya Внутренняя Передает вес
Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah Внутренняя Передает вес
When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla Внутренняя Передает вес
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34 Внутренняя Передает вес
Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act Внутренняя Передает вес
Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims Внутренняя Передает вес
Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers Внутренняя Передает вес
Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026 Внутренняя Передает вес
2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT Внутренняя Передает вес
2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II Внутренняя Передает вес
2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI Внутренняя Передает вес
Poonam Bisht Внешняя Передает вес
Privacy Policy Внутренняя Передает вес
Webinars Внутренняя Передает вес
Submit Article Внутренняя Передает вес
Download App Внешняя Передает вес
Contact Us Внутренняя Передает вес
About Us Внутренняя Передает вес
Acronyms Внутренняя Передает вес
ToS Внутренняя Передает вес
Privacy Policy Внутренняя Передает вес
Disclaimer & Copyright Внутренняя Передает вес

Ключевые слова

Облако ключевых слов

print laws search insolvency case ibc onepage bulletins renew journal

Содержание ключевых слов

Ключевое слово Контент Заголовок страницы Ключевые слова Описание страницы Заголовки
insolvency 3
bulletins 2
case 2
laws 2
ibc 1

Юзабилити

Домен

Домен : ibclaw.in

Длина : 9

Favicon

Отлично, Ваш сайт имеет favicon.

Пригодность для печати

Плохо. Мы не нашли CSS файл, отвечающий за печать веб-сайта.

Язык

Хорошо, Ваш установленный язык веб-сайта: en.

Dublin Core

Ваш веб-сайт не использует преимущества Dublin Core.

Документ

Doctype

HTML 5

Кодировка

Замечательно. Кодировка веб-сайта: UTF-8.

W3C Validity

Ошибок : 0

Предупреждений : 0

Приватность эл. почты

Внимание! Как минимум 1 адрес эл. почты был найден в контенте. Воспользуйтесь бесплатной защитой от спама, чтобы скрыть адрес от спамеров.

Устаревший HTML

Отлично. Мы не нашли устаревших тэгов в Вашем HTML.

Скорость загрузки

Отлично, Ваш веб-сайт не содержит вложенных таблиц.
Слишком плохо. Ваш веб-сайт использует встроенные CSS правила в HTML тэгах.
Замечательно. Ваш веб-сайт имеет мало CSS файлов.
Плохо. Ваш веб-сайт имеет слишком много JavaScript файлов (больше чем 6).
Замечательно, ваш сайт использует возможность gzip сжатия.

Мобильный телефон

Оптимизация под моб. телефон

Apple иконки
Meta Viewport Тэг
Flash контент

Оптимизация

XML карта сайта

Отлично, ваш сайт имеет XML карту сайта.

https://ibclaw.in/news-sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/wp-sitemap.xml

Robots.txt

https://ibclaw.in/robots.txt

Отлично, ваш веб-сайт содержит файл robots.txt.

Аналитика

Отсутствует

Мы не нашли ни одной аналитической программы на вашем сайте.

Веб аналитика позволяет следить за активностью пользователей на вашем веб-сайте. Вы должны установить как минимум один инструмент, но также хорошо иметь несколько, чтобы сравнивать показания между собой.

PageSpeed Insights

Устройство
Категории

Free SEO Testing Tool

Free SEO Testing Tool - это бесплатный СЕО инструмент, который поможет вам проанализировать Ваш веб-сайт.