ibclaw.in

Revisión web de ibclaw.in

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

 Generado el 02 Mayo 2026 17:29 PM

Resultados antiguos? ACTUALIZAR !

La puntuación es 56/100

Contenido SEO

Título

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

Longitud : 87

Preferiblemente, tu título debería contener entre 10 y 70 caracteres (espacios incluidos). Usa esta herramienta gratuita para calcular la longitud del texto.

Descripción

India’s Leading Insolvency Platform. IBC Laws publishes case laws, legal contents, commentary, articles with wide range of search functions using advance technology. A complete guide on Indian Insolvency Laws. All about Indian Insolvency Laws.

Longitud : 243

Preferiblemente tu descripción meta debe contener entre 70 y 160 caracteres (espacios incluidos). Usa esta herramienta gratuita para calcular la longitu del texto.

Palabras Claves (Keywords)

Muy mal. No hemos encontrado palabras clave (meta keywords) en tu página. Usa este generador de meta tags gratuito para crear tus palabras clave.

Propiedades Meta Og

Esta página no usa etiquetas Og. Estas etiquetas permiten a los rastreadores sociales estructurar mejor tu página. Usa este generador de etiquetas og gratuito para crearlas.

Titulos

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
0 20 4 39 3 16
  • [H2] All about Indian Insolvency Laws | All-in-One
  • [H2] Welcome to India’s #1 Insolvency Platform
  • [H2] Dedicated Unified Platform | All-in-One
  • [H2] Complete Case Summary (DeepSummary) with HeadNote
  • [H2] Expert Note/ Case Brief
  • [H2] Case Status/ Cross Linking
  • [H2] AI-Trained Query Search
  • [H2] EXTRA Filters
  • [H2] Powerful Search with Boolean Operators
  • [H2] Court Friendly Print/ PDF
  • [H2] Case Note & MyFolder
  • [H2] Legal Contents
  • [H2] One Dashboard & Easy Login
  • [H2] Periodically Digests
  • [H2] Regular WhatsApp/ Email Updates
  • [H2] Mobile, Tablet & Desktop Friendly
  • [H2] Trusted by Courts/ Tribunals
  • [H2] Testimonials
  • [H2] Our Subscribers
  • [H2] India’s Leading Insolvency Platform
  • [H3] Find right case law, analyse it with DeepSummary, and stay updated with timely, complete, accurate, and reliable reporting
  • [H3] Explore the Platform Features
  • [H3] Contact Details​
  • [H3] Start Now
  • [H4] A structured legal research database offering comprehensive case summaries (DeepSummary) along with verbatim full texts of judgments, HeadNotes, editorially curated case briefs, AI-trained query search, in-depth research through EXTRA filters, powerful advanced search with Boolean operators, personal case notes, MyFolder, court-ready PDFs, and integrated statutory content—designed for precise, efficient, and in-depth legal research, all on one unified platform.
  • [H4] An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench
  • [H4] Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
  • [H4] While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench
  • [H4] Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT
  • [H4] RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT
  • [H4] Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai
  • [H4] Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court
  • [H4] Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya
  • [H4] Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah
  • [H4] When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla
  • [H4] Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims
  • [H4] Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers
  • [H4] Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026
  • [H4] Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI
  • [H5] ✅ Trusted by Courts & Tribunals
  • [H5] Phone Numbers​​
  • [H5] Email
  • [H6] Smt. Bidisha Banerjee
  • [H6] Justice Rohit Kapoor
  • [H6] Ramji Srinivasan
  • [H6] Justice Rajasekhar VK
  • [H6] Dr. Neeti Shikha
  • [H6] Adv. Kajal Bhatia
  • [H6] Dr. Charu Mathur
  • [H6] Dr. M. S. Sahoo
  • [H6] Adv. CS Dr. Mamta Binani
  • [H6] Arvind Devanathan
  • [H6] Poonam Bisht
  • [H6] Raj Panchmatia
  • [H6] Adv. Nipun Singhvi
  • [H6] Anjali Sharma, Adv & Insolvency Professional
  • [H6] Get in Touch
  • [H6] Get Case Laws on WhatsApp

Imagenes

Hemos encontrado 263 imágenes en esta web.

254 atributos alt están vacios o no existen. Agrega texto alternativo para que los motores de búsqueda puedan entender las imágenes.

Ratio Texto/HTML

Ratio : 0%

El ratio entre texto y código HTML de esta página es menor que el 15 por ciento, esto significa que tu web posiblemente necesite más contenido en texto.

Flash

Perfecto, no se ha detectado contenido Flash en la página.

Iframe

Genial, no se han detectado Iframes en la página.

Reescritura URL

Bien. Tus enlaces parecen amigables

Guiones bajos en las URLs

Perfecto! No hemos detectado guiones bajos en tus URLs

Enlaces en página

Hemos encontrado un total de 61 enlaces incluyendo 0 enlace(s) a ficheros

Ancla Tipo Jugo
Skip to content Interna Pasando Jugo
WA Updates Interna Pasando Jugo
MyFolders|Notes Interna Pasando Jugo
Acts Interna Pasando Jugo
Articles Interna Pasando Jugo
OnePage Interna Pasando Jugo
Case Laws Interna Pasando Jugo
AI Search Interna Pasando Jugo
Insolvency Journal (Print) Interna Pasando Jugo
Renew Interna Pasando Jugo
Login Interna Pasando Jugo
Subscription Interna Pasando Jugo
An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interna Pasando Jugo
The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench Interna Pasando Jugo
Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interna Pasando Jugo
Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Interna Pasando Jugo
While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench Interna Pasando Jugo
Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT Interna Pasando Jugo
RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT Interna Pasando Jugo
Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai Interna Pasando Jugo
Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai Interna Pasando Jugo
Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai Interna Pasando Jugo
Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Interna Pasando Jugo
When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court Interna Pasando Jugo
Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya Interna Pasando Jugo
Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah Interna Pasando Jugo
When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla Interna Pasando Jugo
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34 Interna Pasando Jugo
Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act Interna Pasando Jugo
Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims Interna Pasando Jugo
Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers Interna Pasando Jugo
Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Pasando Jugo
2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT Interna Pasando Jugo
2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II Interna Pasando Jugo
2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI Interna Pasando Jugo
Poonam Bisht Externo Pasando Jugo
Privacy Policy Interna Pasando Jugo
Webinars Interna Pasando Jugo
Submit Article Interna Pasando Jugo
Download App Externo Pasando Jugo
Contact Us Interna Pasando Jugo
About Us Interna Pasando Jugo
Acronyms Interna Pasando Jugo
ToS Interna Pasando Jugo
Privacy Policy Interna Pasando Jugo
Disclaimer & Copyright Interna Pasando Jugo

Palabras Clave SEO

Nube de Palabras Clave

bulletins journal renew insolvency print onepage ibc laws case search

Consistencia de las Palabras Clave

Palabra Clave (Keyword) Contenido Título Palabras Claves (Keywords) Descripción Titulos
insolvency 3
bulletins 2
case 2
laws 2
ibc 1

Usabilidad

Url

Dominio : ibclaw.in

Longitud : 9

Favicon

Genial, tu web tiene un favicon.

Imprimibilidad

No hemos encontrado una hoja de estilos CSS para impresión.

Idioma

Genial. Has declarado el idioma en.

Dublin Core

Esta página no usa Dublin Core.

Documento

Tipo de documento (Doctype)

HTML 5

Codificación

Perfecto. Has declarado como codificación UTF-8.

Validez W3C

Errores : 0

Avisos : 0

Privacidad de los Emails

Atención! Hemos encontrado por lo menos una dirección de correo electrónico en texto plano. Usa este protector antispam gratuito para ocultarla de los spammers.

HTML obsoleto

Genial, no hemos detectado ninguna etiqueta HTML obsoleta.

Consejos de Velocidad

Excelente, esta web no usa tablas.
Muy mal, tu web está usando estilos embenidos (inline CSS).
Genial, tu página web usa muy pocos ficheros CSS.
Muy mal, tu sitio usa demasiados ficheros JavaScript (más de 6).
Su sitio web se beneficia del tipo de compresión gzip. ¡Perfecto!

Movil

Optimización Móvil

Icono para Apple
Etiqueta Meta Viewport
Contenido Flash

Optimización

Mapa del sitio XML

¡Perfecto! Su sitio tiene un mapa del sitio en XML.

https://ibclaw.in/news-sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/wp-sitemap.xml

Robots.txt

https://ibclaw.in/robots.txt

¡Estupendo! Su sitio web tiene un archivo robots.txt.

Herramientas de Analítica

No disponible

No hemos encontrado ninguna herramienta de analítica en esta web.

La analítica Web le permite medir la actividad de los visitantes de su sitio web. Debería tener instalada al menos una herramienta de analítica y se recomienda instalar otra más para obtener una confirmación de los resultados.

PageSpeed Insights

Dispositivo
Categorias

Free SEO Testing Tool

Free SEO Testing Tool es una herramienta seo gratuita que te ayuda a analizar tu web