ibclaw.in

Analisi sito web ibclaw.in

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

 Generato il Maggio 02 2026 17:29 PM

Statistiche non aggiornate? AGGIORNA !

Il punteggio e 56/100

SEO Content

Title

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

Lunghezza : 87

Idealmente, il tuo title dovrebbe contenere tra 10 e 70 caratteri (spazi inclusi). Usa questo strumento free per calcolare la lunghezza del testo.

Description

India’s Leading Insolvency Platform. IBC Laws publishes case laws, legal contents, commentary, articles with wide range of search functions using advance technology. A complete guide on Indian Insolvency Laws. All about Indian Insolvency Laws.

Lunghezza : 243

Idealmente, la tua meta description dovrebbe contenere tra 70 e 160 caratteri (spazi inclusi). Usa questo strumento free per calcolare la lunghezza del testo.

Keywords

Molto male. Non abbiamo trovato meta keywords nella tua pagina. Usa questo generatore gratuito online di meta tags per creare keywords.

Og Meta Properties

Questa pagina non sfrutta i vantaggi Og Properties. Questi tags consentono ai social crawler di strutturare meglio la tua pagina. Use questo generatore gratuito di og properties per crearli.

Headings

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
0 20 4 39 3 16
  • [H2] All about Indian Insolvency Laws | All-in-One
  • [H2] Welcome to India’s #1 Insolvency Platform
  • [H2] Dedicated Unified Platform | All-in-One
  • [H2] Complete Case Summary (DeepSummary) with HeadNote
  • [H2] Expert Note/ Case Brief
  • [H2] Case Status/ Cross Linking
  • [H2] AI-Trained Query Search
  • [H2] EXTRA Filters
  • [H2] Powerful Search with Boolean Operators
  • [H2] Court Friendly Print/ PDF
  • [H2] Case Note & MyFolder
  • [H2] Legal Contents
  • [H2] One Dashboard & Easy Login
  • [H2] Periodically Digests
  • [H2] Regular WhatsApp/ Email Updates
  • [H2] Mobile, Tablet & Desktop Friendly
  • [H2] Trusted by Courts/ Tribunals
  • [H2] Testimonials
  • [H2] Our Subscribers
  • [H2] India’s Leading Insolvency Platform
  • [H3] Find right case law, analyse it with DeepSummary, and stay updated with timely, complete, accurate, and reliable reporting
  • [H3] Explore the Platform Features
  • [H3] Contact Details​
  • [H3] Start Now
  • [H4] A structured legal research database offering comprehensive case summaries (DeepSummary) along with verbatim full texts of judgments, HeadNotes, editorially curated case briefs, AI-trained query search, in-depth research through EXTRA filters, powerful advanced search with Boolean operators, personal case notes, MyFolder, court-ready PDFs, and integrated statutory content—designed for precise, efficient, and in-depth legal research, all on one unified platform.
  • [H4] An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench
  • [H4] Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
  • [H4] While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench
  • [H4] Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT
  • [H4] RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT
  • [H4] Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai
  • [H4] Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court
  • [H4] Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya
  • [H4] Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah
  • [H4] When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla
  • [H4] Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims
  • [H4] Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers
  • [H4] Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026
  • [H4] Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI
  • [H5] ✅ Trusted by Courts & Tribunals
  • [H5] Phone Numbers​​
  • [H5] Email
  • [H6] Smt. Bidisha Banerjee
  • [H6] Justice Rohit Kapoor
  • [H6] Ramji Srinivasan
  • [H6] Justice Rajasekhar VK
  • [H6] Dr. Neeti Shikha
  • [H6] Adv. Kajal Bhatia
  • [H6] Dr. Charu Mathur
  • [H6] Dr. M. S. Sahoo
  • [H6] Adv. CS Dr. Mamta Binani
  • [H6] Arvind Devanathan
  • [H6] Poonam Bisht
  • [H6] Raj Panchmatia
  • [H6] Adv. Nipun Singhvi
  • [H6] Anjali Sharma, Adv & Insolvency Professional
  • [H6] Get in Touch
  • [H6] Get Case Laws on WhatsApp

Images

Abbiamo trovato 263 immagini in questa pagina web.

254 attributi alt sono vuoti o mancanti. Aggiungi testo alternativo in modo tale che i motori di ricerca possano comprendere meglio il contenuto delle tue immagini.

Text/HTML Ratio

Ratio : 0%

Il rapporto testo/codice HTML di questa pagina e inferiore a 15 percento, questo significa che il tuo sito web necessita probabilmente di molto piu contenuto.

Flash

Perfetto, non e stato rilevato contenuto Flash in questa pagina.

Iframe

Grande, non sono stati rilevati Iframes in questa pagina.

URL Rewrite

Buono. I tuoi links appaiono friendly!

Underscores in the URLs

Perfetto! Non sono stati rilevati underscores nei tuoi URLs.

In-page links

Abbiamo trovato un totale di 61 links inclusi 0 link(s) a files

Anchor Type Juice
Skip to content Interno Passing Juice
WA Updates Interno Passing Juice
MyFolders|Notes Interno Passing Juice
Acts Interno Passing Juice
Articles Interno Passing Juice
OnePage Interno Passing Juice
Case Laws Interno Passing Juice
AI Search Interno Passing Juice
Insolvency Journal (Print) Interno Passing Juice
Renew Interno Passing Juice
Login Interno Passing Juice
Subscription Interno Passing Juice
An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Interno Passing Juice
Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interno Passing Juice
The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench Interno Passing Juice
Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interno Passing Juice
Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Interno Passing Juice
While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench Interno Passing Juice
Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT Interno Passing Juice
RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT Interno Passing Juice
Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court Interno Passing Juice
Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai Interno Passing Juice
Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai Interno Passing Juice
Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai Interno Passing Juice
Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court Interno Passing Juice
Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Interno Passing Juice
When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Interno Passing Juice
Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court Interno Passing Juice
Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court Interno Passing Juice
Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court Interno Passing Juice
Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya Interno Passing Juice
Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah Interno Passing Juice
When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla Interno Passing Juice
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34 Interno Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act Interno Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims Interno Passing Juice
Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers Interno Passing Juice
Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026 Interno Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT Interno Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II Interno Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI Interno Passing Juice
Poonam Bisht Externo Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interno Passing Juice
Webinars Interno Passing Juice
Submit Article Interno Passing Juice
Download App Externo Passing Juice
Contact Us Interno Passing Juice
About Us Interno Passing Juice
Acronyms Interno Passing Juice
ToS Interno Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interno Passing Juice
Disclaimer & Copyright Interno Passing Juice

SEO Keywords

Keywords Cloud

ibc journal insolvency print renew search laws bulletins case onepage

Consistenza Keywords

Keyword Contenuto Title Keywords Description Headings
insolvency 3
bulletins 2
case 2
laws 2
ibc 1

Usabilita

Url

Dominio : ibclaw.in

Lunghezza : 9

Favicon

Grande, il tuo sito usa una favicon.

Stampabilita

Non abbiamo riscontrato codice CSS Print-Friendly.

Lingua

Buono. La tua lingua dichiarata en.

Dublin Core

Questa pagina non sfrutta i vantaggi di Dublin Core.

Documento

Doctype

HTML 5

Encoding

Perfetto. Hai dichiarato che il tuo charset e UTF-8.

Validita W3C

Errori : 0

Avvisi : 0

Email Privacy

Attenzione! E stato trovato almeno un indirizzo mail in plain text. Usa antispam protector gratuito per nascondere gli indirizzi mail agli spammers.

Deprecated HTML

Grande! Non abbiamo trovato tags HTML deprecati nel tuo codice.

Suggerimenti per velocizzare

Eccellente, il tuo sito web non utilizza nested tables.
Molto male, il tuo sito web utilizza stili CSS inline.
Grande, il tuo sito web ha pochi file CSS.
Molto male, il tuo sito web ha troppi file JS (piu di 6).
Perfetto, il vostro sito si avvale di gzip.

Mobile

Mobile Optimization

Apple Icon
Meta Viewport Tag
Flash content

Ottimizzazione

XML Sitemap

Grande, il vostro sito ha una sitemap XML.

https://ibclaw.in/news-sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/wp-sitemap.xml

Robots.txt

https://ibclaw.in/robots.txt

Grande, il vostro sito ha un file robots.txt.

Analytics

Non trovato

Non abbiamo rilevato uno strumento di analisi installato su questo sito web.

Web analytics consentono di misurare l'attività dei visitatori sul tuo sito web. Si dovrebbe avere installato almeno un strumento di analisi, ma può anche essere buona per installare una seconda, al fine di un controllo incrociato dei dati.

PageSpeed Insights

Dispositivo
Categorie

Free SEO Testing Tool

Free SEO Testing Tool e uno strumento di ottimizzazione per i motori di ricerca (seo tool) che serve per analizzare le tue pagine web