ibclaw.in

Webbplats analys ibclaw.in

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

 Genereras på Maj 02 2026 17:29 PM

Gammal statistik? UPDATERA !

Ställningen är 56/100

SEO Innehåll

Titel

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

Längd : 87

Idealisk, din titel bör innehålla mellan 10 och 70 tecken (mellanslag räknas som tecken). Använd denna gratis verktyg för att räkna ut textlängden.

Beskrivning

India’s Leading Insolvency Platform. IBC Laws publishes case laws, legal contents, commentary, articles with wide range of search functions using advance technology. A complete guide on Indian Insolvency Laws. All about Indian Insolvency Laws.

Längd : 243

Idealisk, din metabeskrivning bör innehålla mellan 70 och 160 tecken (mellanslag räknas som tecken). Använd denna gratis verktyg för att räkna ut textlängden.

Nyckelord

Mycket dåligt. Vi har inte lyckats hitta några meta-taggar på din sida. Använd denna meta-tag generator, gratis för att skapa nyckelord.

Og Meta Egenskaper

Den här sidan drar inte nytta utav Og. Deras taggar möjliggör sociala sökrobotar att bättre strukturera strukturera din sida. Använd denna og generatorn gratis för att skapa dom.

Rubriker

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
0 20 4 39 3 16
  • [H2] All about Indian Insolvency Laws | All-in-One
  • [H2] Welcome to India’s #1 Insolvency Platform
  • [H2] Dedicated Unified Platform | All-in-One
  • [H2] Complete Case Summary (DeepSummary) with HeadNote
  • [H2] Expert Note/ Case Brief
  • [H2] Case Status/ Cross Linking
  • [H2] AI-Trained Query Search
  • [H2] EXTRA Filters
  • [H2] Powerful Search with Boolean Operators
  • [H2] Court Friendly Print/ PDF
  • [H2] Case Note & MyFolder
  • [H2] Legal Contents
  • [H2] One Dashboard & Easy Login
  • [H2] Periodically Digests
  • [H2] Regular WhatsApp/ Email Updates
  • [H2] Mobile, Tablet & Desktop Friendly
  • [H2] Trusted by Courts/ Tribunals
  • [H2] Testimonials
  • [H2] Our Subscribers
  • [H2] India’s Leading Insolvency Platform
  • [H3] Find right case law, analyse it with DeepSummary, and stay updated with timely, complete, accurate, and reliable reporting
  • [H3] Explore the Platform Features
  • [H3] Contact Details​
  • [H3] Start Now
  • [H4] A structured legal research database offering comprehensive case summaries (DeepSummary) along with verbatim full texts of judgments, HeadNotes, editorially curated case briefs, AI-trained query search, in-depth research through EXTRA filters, powerful advanced search with Boolean operators, personal case notes, MyFolder, court-ready PDFs, and integrated statutory content—designed for precise, efficient, and in-depth legal research, all on one unified platform.
  • [H4] An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench
  • [H4] Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
  • [H4] While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench
  • [H4] Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT
  • [H4] RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT
  • [H4] Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai
  • [H4] Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court
  • [H4] Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya
  • [H4] Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah
  • [H4] When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla
  • [H4] Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims
  • [H4] Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers
  • [H4] Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026
  • [H4] Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI
  • [H5] ✅ Trusted by Courts & Tribunals
  • [H5] Phone Numbers​​
  • [H5] Email
  • [H6] Smt. Bidisha Banerjee
  • [H6] Justice Rohit Kapoor
  • [H6] Ramji Srinivasan
  • [H6] Justice Rajasekhar VK
  • [H6] Dr. Neeti Shikha
  • [H6] Adv. Kajal Bhatia
  • [H6] Dr. Charu Mathur
  • [H6] Dr. M. S. Sahoo
  • [H6] Adv. CS Dr. Mamta Binani
  • [H6] Arvind Devanathan
  • [H6] Poonam Bisht
  • [H6] Raj Panchmatia
  • [H6] Adv. Nipun Singhvi
  • [H6] Anjali Sharma, Adv & Insolvency Professional
  • [H6] Get in Touch
  • [H6] Get Case Laws on WhatsApp

Bilder

Vi hittade 263 bilder på denna webbsida.

254 alt attribut är tomma eller saknas. Lägg till alternativ text så att sökmotorer enklare kan förstå innehållet i dina bilder.

Text/HTML Ratio

Ratio : 0%

Denna sidas förhållande mellan text till HTML-kod är lägre än 15 procent, vilket innebär att din webbplats troligen behöver mer textinnehåll.

Flash

Perfekt, inga Flash-innehåll har upptäckts på denna sida.

Iframe

Bra, vi upptäckte inga Iframes på den här sidan.

URL Rewrite

Bra. Dina adressfält ser bra ut!

Understreck i URLen

Perfekt! Inga understreck upptäcktes i din webbadress.

In-page länkar

Vi hittade totalt 61 länkar inklusive 0 länk(ar) till filer

Anchor Typ Juice
Skip to content Interna Passing Juice
WA Updates Interna Passing Juice
MyFolders|Notes Interna Passing Juice
Acts Interna Passing Juice
Articles Interna Passing Juice
OnePage Interna Passing Juice
Case Laws Interna Passing Juice
AI Search Interna Passing Juice
Insolvency Journal (Print) Interna Passing Juice
Renew Interna Passing Juice
Login Interna Passing Juice
Subscription Interna Passing Juice
An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Interna Passing Juice
Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interna Passing Juice
The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench Interna Passing Juice
Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interna Passing Juice
Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Interna Passing Juice
While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench Interna Passing Juice
Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT Interna Passing Juice
RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT Interna Passing Juice
Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court Interna Passing Juice
Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai Interna Passing Juice
Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai Interna Passing Juice
Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai Interna Passing Juice
Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court Interna Passing Juice
Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Interna Passing Juice
When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Interna Passing Juice
Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court Interna Passing Juice
Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court Interna Passing Juice
Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court Interna Passing Juice
Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya Interna Passing Juice
Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah Interna Passing Juice
When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla Interna Passing Juice
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34 Interna Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act Interna Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims Interna Passing Juice
Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers Interna Passing Juice
Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026 Interna Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT Interna Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II Interna Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI Interna Passing Juice
Poonam Bisht Externa Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interna Passing Juice
Webinars Interna Passing Juice
Submit Article Interna Passing Juice
Download App Externa Passing Juice
Contact Us Interna Passing Juice
About Us Interna Passing Juice
Acronyms Interna Passing Juice
ToS Interna Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interna Passing Juice
Disclaimer & Copyright Interna Passing Juice

SEO Nyckelord

Nyckelord Moln

insolvency search onepage journal bulletins laws print ibc renew case

Nyckelord Konsistens

Nyckelord Innehåll Titel Nyckelord Beskrivning Rubriker
insolvency 3
bulletins 2
case 2
laws 2
ibc 1

Användbarhet

Url

Domän : ibclaw.in

Längd : 9

Favikon

Bra, din webbplats har en favicon.

Utskriftbart

Vi kunde inte hitta CSS för utskrifter.

Språk

Bra. Ditt angivna språk är en.

Dublin Core

Denna sida drar inte nytta utav Dublin Core.

Dokument

Doctype

HTML 5

Encoding

Perfekt. Din deklarerade teckenuppsättning är UTF-8.

W3C Validity

Errors : 0

Varningar : 0

E-post Sekretess

Varning! Minst en e-postadress har påträffats i klartext. Använd gratis antispam skydd för att dölja e-post från spammare.

Föråldrad HTML

Bra! Vi har inte hittat några föråldrad HTML taggar i din HTML.

Hastighets Tips

Utmärkt, din webbplats använder inga nästlade tabeller.
Synd, din webbplats använder sig utav inline stilar.
Bra, din webbplats har få CSS-filer.
Synd, din webbplats har för många JS filer (fler än 6 stycken).
Perfekt, din webbplats utnyttjar gzip.

Mobil

Mobiloptimering

Apple Ikon
Meta Viewport Tagg
Flash innehåll

Optimering

XML Sitemap

Bra, din webbplats har en XML sitemap.

https://ibclaw.in/news-sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/wp-sitemap.xml

Robots.txt

https://ibclaw.in/robots.txt

Bra, din webbplats har en robots.txt fil.

Analytics

Saknas

Vi hittade inte någon analysverktyg på din webbplats.

Webbanalys program kan mäta besökare på din webbplats. Du bör ha minst ett analysverktyg installerat, men det kan också vara en bra ide att installera två för att dubbelkolla uppgifterna.

PageSpeed Insights

Enhet
Kategorier

Free SEO Testing Tool

Free SEO Testing Tool är en fri SEO verktyg som hjälper dig att analysera din webbplats