ibclaw.in

Evaluation du site ibclaw.in

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

 Généré le 02 Mai 2026 17:29

Vieilles statistiques? UPDATE !

Le score est de 56/100

Optimisation du contenu

Titre

IBC Laws – All-in-One Legal Research Platform for Insolvency, Dispute & Debt Resolution

Longueur : 87

Idéalement, votre titre devrait contenir entre 10 et 70 caractères (espaces compris). Utilisez cet outil gratuit pour calculer la longueur du texte.

Description

India’s Leading Insolvency Platform. IBC Laws publishes case laws, legal contents, commentary, articles with wide range of search functions using advance technology. A complete guide on Indian Insolvency Laws. All about Indian Insolvency Laws.

Longueur : 243

Idéalement, votre balise META description devrait contenir entre 70 et 160 caractères (espaces compris). Utilisez cet outil gratuit pour calculer la longueur du texte.

Mots-clefs

Très mauvais. Nous n'avons pas trouvé de balise META keywords sur votre page. Utilisez ce générateur gratuit de balises META en ligne pour créer des mots-clés.

Propriétés Open Graph

Cette page ne profite pas des balises META Open Graph. Cette balise permet de représenter de manière riche n'importe quelle page dans le graph social (environnement social). Utilisez ce générateur gratuit de balises META Open Graph pour les créer.

Niveaux de titre

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
0 20 4 39 3 16
  • [H2] All about Indian Insolvency Laws | All-in-One
  • [H2] Welcome to India’s #1 Insolvency Platform
  • [H2] Dedicated Unified Platform | All-in-One
  • [H2] Complete Case Summary (DeepSummary) with HeadNote
  • [H2] Expert Note/ Case Brief
  • [H2] Case Status/ Cross Linking
  • [H2] AI-Trained Query Search
  • [H2] EXTRA Filters
  • [H2] Powerful Search with Boolean Operators
  • [H2] Court Friendly Print/ PDF
  • [H2] Case Note & MyFolder
  • [H2] Legal Contents
  • [H2] One Dashboard & Easy Login
  • [H2] Periodically Digests
  • [H2] Regular WhatsApp/ Email Updates
  • [H2] Mobile, Tablet & Desktop Friendly
  • [H2] Trusted by Courts/ Tribunals
  • [H2] Testimonials
  • [H2] Our Subscribers
  • [H2] India’s Leading Insolvency Platform
  • [H3] Find right case law, analyse it with DeepSummary, and stay updated with timely, complete, accurate, and reliable reporting
  • [H3] Explore the Platform Features
  • [H3] Contact Details​
  • [H3] Start Now
  • [H4] A structured legal research database offering comprehensive case summaries (DeepSummary) along with verbatim full texts of judgments, HeadNotes, editorially curated case briefs, AI-trained query search, in-depth research through EXTRA filters, powerful advanced search with Boolean operators, personal case notes, MyFolder, court-ready PDFs, and integrated statutory content—designed for precise, efficient, and in-depth legal research, all on one unified platform.
  • [H4] An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench
  • [H4] Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench
  • [H4] Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
  • [H4] While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench
  • [H4] Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT
  • [H4] RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT
  • [H4] Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai
  • [H4] Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai
  • [H4] Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
  • [H4] Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court
  • [H4] Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court
  • [H4] Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court
  • [H4] Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya
  • [H4] Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah
  • [H4] When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla
  • [H4] Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • [H4] Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims
  • [H4] Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026
  • [H4] Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers
  • [H4] Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026
  • [H4] Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II
  • [H4] 2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI
  • [H5] ✅ Trusted by Courts & Tribunals
  • [H5] Phone Numbers​​
  • [H5] Email
  • [H6] Smt. Bidisha Banerjee
  • [H6] Justice Rohit Kapoor
  • [H6] Ramji Srinivasan
  • [H6] Justice Rajasekhar VK
  • [H6] Dr. Neeti Shikha
  • [H6] Adv. Kajal Bhatia
  • [H6] Dr. Charu Mathur
  • [H6] Dr. M. S. Sahoo
  • [H6] Adv. CS Dr. Mamta Binani
  • [H6] Arvind Devanathan
  • [H6] Poonam Bisht
  • [H6] Raj Panchmatia
  • [H6] Adv. Nipun Singhvi
  • [H6] Anjali Sharma, Adv & Insolvency Professional
  • [H6] Get in Touch
  • [H6] Get Case Laws on WhatsApp

Images

Nous avons trouvé 263 image(s) sur cette page Web.

254 attribut(s) alt sont vides ou manquants. Ajouter un texte alternatif permet aux moteurs de recherche de mieux comprendre le contenu de vos images.

Ratio texte/HTML

Ratio : 0%

le ratio de cette page texte/HTML est au-dessous de 15 pour cent, ce qui signifie que votre site manque de contenu textuel.

Flash

Parfait, aucun contenu FLASH n'a été détecté sur cette page.

Iframe

Génial, il n'y a pas d'Iframes détectés sur cette page.

Réécriture d'URLs

Bien. Vos liens sont optimisés!

Tiret bas dans les URLs

Parfait! Aucuns soulignements détectés dans vos URLs.

Liens dans la page

Nous avons trouvé un total de 61 lien(s) dont 0 lien(s) vers des fichiers

Texte d'ancre Type Juice
Skip to content Interne Passing Juice
WA Updates Interne Passing Juice
MyFolders|Notes Interne Passing Juice
Acts Interne Passing Juice
Articles Interne Passing Juice
OnePage Interne Passing Juice
Case Laws Interne Passing Juice
AI Search Interne Passing Juice
Insolvency Journal (Print) Interne Passing Juice
Renew Interne Passing Juice
Login Interne Passing Juice
Subscription Interne Passing Juice
An admission of a claim by Resolution Professional does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 – Shankar Khandelwal Vs. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Interne Passing Juice
Invocation of provisions of SARFAESI Act and filling of an OA before Ld. DRT do not invalidate the filling of application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 – Canara Bank Vs. Shewta Deepak Patel – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interne Passing Juice
The threshold of Rs. 1 crore under Section 4 of IBC is to be seen at the time of filing of the CIRP application and not subsequent thereto – Mangal Sales Corporation Vs. Prolific Papers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT New Delhi Bench Interne Passing Juice
Secured creditor failing to clearly intimate decision to realise security interest in Form D within Liquidation Process Regulation 21A timeline and continuing as SCC member not entitled to invoke option under Section 52 of IBC at later stage – Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Mahajan, Liquidator of Jans Copper Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Mumbai Bench Interne Passing Juice
Whether surplus cash flow/ profit generated during CIRP, before the approval and implementation of Resolution Plan, belongs to Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), or it must be distributed amongst stakeholders/creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC? – Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Interne Passing Juice
While the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of the CIRP, such jurisdiction cannot be exercised to reopen or revive claims that stand settled in terms of an approved Resolution Plan | For an expense (lease expense) to qualify as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs (IRPC) under CIRP Regulation 31, it must ordinarily be incurred by the IRP/RP for conduct of CIRP/going concern and be placed before and approved/ratified by the CoC – DBS Bank India Ltd. Vs. Orchid Pharma Ltd. and Ors. – NCLT Chennai Bench Interne Passing Juice
Section 31(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 confines respondents in a complaint to promoter, allottee or real estate agent, rendering a site in-charge not shown to fall in those categories not a necessary party – Soumya Ranjan Jena Vs. Priyata Lipsa and Ors. – Odisha REAT Interne Passing Juice
RERA Covid-19 circulars extending completion date by 9 months applicable where contractual due date falls on or after 15.03.2020, shifting promoter’s delay-interest liability to commence from extended due date – Alekhya Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Resmi Maream Vergis and Ors. – Karnataka REAT Interne Passing Juice
Retrospective reliance on Newtech to treat an unappealed RERA refund order as non est refused where order had attained finality and writ was barred by inordinate delay and discretionary laches – Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court Interne Passing Juice
Proof of service of Section 13(2) demand notice and compliance with procedure under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, 2002 validate subsequent Section 13(4) possession notice – A.H. Fathima Nasira Vs. Union Bank of India – DRT Chennai Interne Passing Juice
Prior dismissal of SARFAESI applications challenging sale notices attaining finality precludes re-agitation of the same issues under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002; consequential Section 14 order for physical possession sustained – S. Murugesan Vs. District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ors. – DRT Madurai Interne Passing Juice
Rule 8(1) and (2) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 requires service and affixture of possession notice and publication in two leading newspapers before taking possession of immovable secured asset – B. Mahalakshmi Vs. Authorised Officer, REPCO Home Finance Ltd. and Anr. – DRT Madurai Interne Passing Juice
Scheme of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that where a Section 16(2)/(3) plea is rejected, tribunal must proceed and the aggrieved party may challenge only after final award under Section 34 | Section 34 is available only where the arbitral tribunal upholds the jurisdictional plea and terminates the arbitral proceedings – MCM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Construction Industry Development Council – Supreme Court Interne Passing Juice
Leave under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 may be revoked where the plaint’s plea of urgent interim relief is found to be deceptive on record showing prior knowledge of the defendant’s use, negating a real need for urgent interim intervention – Unique Enterprenuers and Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Really Agritech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Interne Passing Juice
When the arbitration clause in the contract uses the word ‘can’, does it necessitate the reference of all disputes to arbitration or is recourse to other dispute resolution mechanisms, including that of the Civil Court, open for the parties? – Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Interne Passing Juice
Agreement for provision of transport services constitutes a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(xviii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; plaint could not be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on parties’ consent where Commercial Division had jurisdiction – Modern Roadways Corporation Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. – Calcutta High Court Interne Passing Juice
Section 17 interim measures based on crystallised admitted liabilities and contractual lock-in payment obligations | Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appellate intervention to render deposit workable by fixed deposit with lien in favour of counterparty – Hella Infra Market Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushkaraj Ispat (India) LLP – Bombay High Court Interne Passing Juice
Loss of profit in arbitration cannot be awarded without pleadings and cogent evidence, and interest on security deposit cannot be granted in the teeth of Clause 8.1 of the NIT barring interest – Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Talat Construction Kharasia Naka – Chhattisgarh High Court Interne Passing Juice
Fast-Track Mergers after the 2025 Amendment: Does Rule 25(1A) (iii) Give Operational Creditors Enough Time? – By Krish Arya Interne Passing Juice
Locked Wallets, Open Courts: India’s Insolvency challenge of Cryptocurrency – By Adv. Parth Paresh Shah Interne Passing Juice
When Creditors Choose Settlement: Scope of Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings under Section 12A of IBC; The Byju’s Insolvency SAGA: Settlement, Withdrawal and The Limits of Section 12A – By Shubhangi Shukla Interne Passing Juice
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16 Arbitration Act Scheme: Jurisdictional Plea Rejection Not Immediately Appealable Under Section 34 Interne Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Is Not Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act Interne Passing Juice
Supreme Court Holds Corporate Guarantee Liability Constitutes Financial Debt Under IBC; Non-Disclosure or Insufficient Stamping Does Not Bar Creditor Claims Interne Passing Juice
Insolvency Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
RERA Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
Debt Recovery Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
Dispute Resolution Bulletin – Weekly Case Laws Digest: 20th April, 2026 to 26th April, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
Extension of last date for receipt of public comments on Discussion Papers Interne Passing Juice
Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
Discussion Paper on IBBI (Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
e-Journal – Insolvency Bulletin – January, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
e-Journal – RERA Bulletin – January, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
e-Journal – Debt Recovery Bulletin – January, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
e-Journal – Dispute Resolution Bulletin – January, 2026 Interne Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Company Law Case Digest | Supreme Court, High Court, NCLAT, NCLT Interne Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | Dispute Resolution Case Digest | Arbitration, Commercial Courts, and MSME Laws | Part-II Interne Passing Juice
2025 Annual Review | NCLT Case Digest of IBC | Chandigarh, Indore, Jaipur, Kochi and Guwahati Benches | Part-VI Interne Passing Juice
Poonam Bisht Externe Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interne Passing Juice
Webinars Interne Passing Juice
Submit Article Interne Passing Juice
Download App Externe Passing Juice
Contact Us Interne Passing Juice
About Us Interne Passing Juice
Acronyms Interne Passing Juice
ToS Interne Passing Juice
Privacy Policy Interne Passing Juice
Disclaimer & Copyright Interne Passing Juice

Mots-clefs

Nuage de mots-clefs

bulletins case journal onepage renew ibc laws search insolvency print

Cohérence des mots-clefs

Mot-clef Contenu Titre Mots-clefs Description Niveaux de titre
insolvency 3
bulletins 2
case 2
laws 2
ibc 1

Ergonomie

Url

Domaine : ibclaw.in

Longueur : 9

Favicon

Génial, votre site web dispose d'un favicon.

Imprimabilité

Aucun style CSS pour optimiser l'impression n'a pu être trouvé.

Langue

Bien. Votre langue est : en.

Dublin Core

Cette page ne profite pas des métadonnées Dublin Core.

Document

Doctype

HTML 5

Encodage

Parfait. Votre charset est UTF-8.

Validité W3C

Erreurs : 0

Avertissements : 0

E-mail confidentialité

Attention! Au moins une adresse e-mail a été trouvée en texte clair. Utilisez une protection anti-spam gratuite pour cacher vos e-mails aux spammeurs.

HTML obsolètes

Génial! Nous n'avons pas trouvé de balises HTML obsolètes dans votre code.

Astuces vitesse

Excellent, votre site n'utilise pas de tableaux imbriqués.
Mauvais, votre site web utilise des styles css inline.
Génial, votre site web contient peu de fichiers CSS.
Mauvais, votre site web contient trop de fichiers javascript (plus de 6).
Parfait : votre site tire parti de gzip.

Mobile

Optimisation mobile

Icône Apple
Méta tags viewport
Contenu FLASH

Optimisation

Sitemap XML

Votre site web dispose d’une sitemap XML, ce qui est optimal.

https://ibclaw.in/news-sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/sitemap.xml
https://ibclaw.in/wp-sitemap.xml

Robots.txt

https://ibclaw.in/robots.txt

Votre site dispose d’un fichier robots.txt, ce qui est optimal.

Mesures d'audience

Manquant

Nous n'avons trouvé aucun outil d'analytics sur ce site.

Un outil de mesure d'audience vous permet d'analyser l’activité des visiteurs sur votre site. Vous devriez installer au moins un outil Analytics. Il est souvent utile d’en rajouter un second, afin de confirmer les résultats du premier.

PageSpeed Insights

Dispositif
Les catégories

Free SEO Testing Tool

Free SEO Testing Tool est un outil gratuit de référencement qui vous aidera à analyser vos pages web